CAJ 1 - Description of Environmental Technology

My topic “Environmental Technology” is a very widespread field as it includes everything that helps to weaken negative impacts of humans on the environment. These negative impacts involve phenomena like air pollution, water pollution, pollution of the soil, global warming and many more. All possible solutions to such problems can be counted as environmental technology. Popular examples for this are photovoltaics, wind energy, water purification or also just simple recycling. Questionable energy sources such as nuclear power could also be included if it does not produce radioactive waste, like the fusion-fission hybrid reactor does not. The main point is that the destruction which is caused by humans living on this planet is reduced.

CAJ 4 - Nuclear Power

For a change of topic in my CAJ, I decided to look into nuclear power as an environmentally friendly option. I am aware that the common fission reactors are not really considered environmentally friendly, even though many people feel that way. Granted, they to not emit greenhouse gases. However, they are insecure and produce huge amounts of radioactive waste. To these problems there already have been found solutions, which results in two better ways to generate energy through nuclear power.

The first and probably more established idea is the fusion reactor. This process does not split the atoms, like in typical fission reactors, but join them. There are many advantages to this idea, like lower waste, more security and higher availability of the resources needed. However, the technology is not quite far enough and many more billions of dollars have to be spend for fusion power research.

The second solution is not as known as the first one but maybe the more realistic one. This concept is called nuclear fusion-fission hybrid and combines nuclear fusion and fission. It was invented back in the 1970s but has not received much interest because fusion seemed more promising. Now that research has shown that fusion power will not be implemented soon, the hybrid version has attracted attention again. As in fusion power alone the energy input is still higher than the energy output, the hybrid version is the only way to make fusion power profitable. Through this hybrid enough energy is produced, waste is reduced to the minimum and safety issues shrink extremely. That is because the fission depends on neutrons provided by the easily stoppable fusion reaction and if the fusion is turned off, the fission reaction stops almost instantly. All this means that this way of generating energy seems reasonably safe and clean.

Photography Project Description "Migrant Mother"

The black and white picture “Migrant Mother” taken by famous photographer Dorothea Lange shows a Native American woman, probably in her 30s, holding a little baby in her arms while being surrounded by two toddlers leaning against their mother’s shoulder. They are hiding their faces, be it out of sombreness, embarrassment or shyness in front of the camera. The simple, slightly ragged yet proper clothes cannot distract from the sad and sorrowful atmosphere that is created by the little family huddled tightly together outside their simple tent. Her hand’s fingertips are resting thoughtfully against her lower jaw. When closely regarding the mother’s face in detail one can see that her face has been wrinkled by raw weather and the worries of her unforgiving life. With her lined forehead and her gaze into the distance, she seems to be troubled by her and her children’s uncertain future. Despite her obvious misery there lies a certain determination and strength in her appearance, as if she was a lonely wolf mother protecting her pups from the woes of the world.

CAJ 3 - Rhetoric Comment

I comment on the rhetoric in this article:

http://singularityhub.com/2010/08/08/solar-roadways-crackpot-idea-or-ingenious-concept-video/

The overall rhetoric in the article “Solar Roadways: Crackpot Idea or Ingenious Concept?” written by Aaron Saenz is not very convincing. For me the main fault is that there is no ethical appeal. The author writes as if he was an expert on this topic and presents many arguments against the solar roadways but he never even tells the reader who he is or what his connection to the topic is. His pathetic appeal is not much better either. Throughout the whole article he uses no pathos. The main emotion I get from reading the article is anger but not because the author provoked it but because his writing style and his arguments are so bad. If depressing and angering the reader is his goal, he achieves it. The logic in the article is not satisfying either. He argues that solar roadways are too expensive and that asphalt roads are cheaper because they are expensive only on highways and not on small roads. However, he doesn’t mention that asphalt roads can never pay for themselves and therefore solar roadways are cheaper in any case, even if it takes 50 years to pay off. All in all the rhetoric in this article is very unconvincing.